<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>RazorsKiss.Net</title>
	<link>http://razorskiss.net</link>
	<description>The Cutting Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 03:51:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.1.4" -->

	<item>
		<title>The Slippery Slope, MS Prop 26, and the Imago Dei</title>
		<description><![CDATA[For days, the blogs and facebook statuses have been replete with pro and anti Prop 26 messages. What I haven&#8217;t seen from the anti side, however, is much of anything that isn&#8217;t a Slippery Slope fallacy. The common refrain is that this proposition will *likely* lead to the banning of abortion, IVF treatments, stem cell [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/11/07/the-slippery-slope-ms-prop-26-and-the-imago-dei/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Allahu Akbar and Omega endorse Triablogue, Chaos ensues.</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Kurshner, contributor to Allahu Akbar and Omega Ministries, (and contributor to Triablogue &#8211; how does that work, again, if you&#8217;re a fellow terrorist sympathizer, and contributor to the group accusing the other of being terrorist sympathizers?) endorses Triablogue review of Roger Olson&#8217;s book. I don&#8217;t know if I can trust Triablogue, now, after these [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/28/dupes-for-jihadist-endorse-triablogue-chaos-ensues/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Answering Seven Reasons: Christ is Head of (the) Mormon Church?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing the series I started with in my prior post, we&#8217;re examining the About.com article &#8220;Seven Reasons Why Mormons are Christian&#8221;, by Rachel Bruner. In our prior post, recall that we examined 1) The remarks of their elder statesmen on this topic, 2) The distinct tendency on the part of the LDS to &#8220;redefine&#8221; terms [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/14/answering-seven-reasons-christ-is-head-of-the-mormon-church/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Seven Reasons Why Mormons are Christian?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In About.com&#8216;s article &#8220;Seven Reasons Why Mormons are Christian&#8220;, Rachel Bruner offers us some interesting claims to examine. Her Seven Reasons are as follows: 1. Christ is Head of Mormon Church 2. Faith in Jesus Christ 3. Prophets Preach of Christ 4. Scriptures Witness of Christ 5. Mormons Act in the Name of Christ 6. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/13/seven-reasons-why-mormons-are-christian/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>On Speaking to Brick Walls</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Baird responded. He still doesn&#8217;t get it. (Surprise, suprise.) I wonder when they are going to learn that it takes an argument to respond to an argument? Paul asks &#8220;Where&#8217;s the beef?&#8221; &#8211; Which, of course, leads me immediately to ask &#8220;Would you know it if you saw it?&#8221; He addresses nothing whatsoever that [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/11/on-speaking-to-brick-walls/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Why Shouldn&#8217;t Paul Baird Choose Hats?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Baird has given us his opinion in the case of the use of worldviews he does not adhere to. This is a common complaint ie why argue a worldview that you do not hold ? The answer is the tallest child in the playground argument ie I do not have to be the tallest [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/10/why-shouldnt-paul-baird-choose-hats/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Adventures in Missing the Antithesis</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Baird recently addressed what he seems to think is the &#8220;philosophy that underpins the Christian Presuppositional Apologetics.&#8221; He&#8217;s wrong, of course, but let us show him why, shall we? He cites Chris&#8217; citation of an argument tucked away in the appendix of PA:S&#038;D as that supposed &#8220;underpinning.&#8221; Interestingly, he goes on to ask why [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/10/adventures-in-missing-the-antithesis/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>So, You Think You&#8217;re a Presuppositionalist?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a significant number of newly &#8220;converted&#8221; (to presup, at least) folks that are quite zealous for the defense of the faith. This, I consider good. On the other hand, Scripture warns us against &#8220;zeal for God, but not in accordance with knowledge&#8221;, in Rom 10:2. This is especially important for us to consider. [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/10/so-you-think-youre-a-presuppositionalist/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Unfortunate Case of the Missing Argument</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not going to link all of Paul&#8217;s posts in this &#8211; they&#8217;ve been linked ad nauseum from here, already. His blog is Patient and Persistent &#8211; I trust our readers are more than capable of finding these comments of his There are times when I&#8217;m engaged in an exchange with someone and I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/10/03/the-unfortunate-case-of-the-missing-argument/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>AOMin should team up with CAIR?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Allahu Akbar and Omega Ministries With this utterly ridiculous post, I have officially lost my respect for Steve Hays. Disgraceful character assassination, asinine argumentation. UPDATE: Dr. White responds.]]></description>
		<link>http://razorskiss.net/2011/09/28/aomin-should-team-up-with-cair/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

